What the Reading Is Against

Put your arm behind your back. You know where it is — not roughly, but well enough to touch a fingertip to a specific knuckle without looking. Now ask what told you.

Adam Dipert has a professional interest in that question. He is a physicist, and he has spent some twenty years as a circus performer, and for the last several years he has been training movement in the absence of weight — parabolic flights, pools, wind tunnels, flotation tanks. He is trying to work out how a person might move well, even beautifully, in a place where nothing falls. The first thing he had to deal with was not a technique problem. It was that his body stopped reporting.

Movers Mindset runs on patronage, not ads.
If this resonates with you, please help keep it going:

moversmindset.com/patrons

The description he uses is not originally his; he takes care to credit it to Kitsou Dubois, a French choreographer who has been making dance for weightlessness since 1990 and has flown twenty-one times, by his count.

“You become only eyes, because you now no longer have a way of sensing where your body is. […] You put your arm behind your back, and what is it that tells you where your arm is? It’s the tension in your shoulder. It’s the torque in your elbow. It’s a lot of things that are all gravitationally oriented.”

That last clause is doing an enormous amount of quiet work, and it is worth slowing down on.

The tension in your shoulder is not a fact about your shoulder. It is a fact about your shoulder and a nine-point-eight-meter-per-second-squared pull that has been present in every reading your nervous system has ever taken. The signal is a relationship. Remove one term and the other stops meaning anything — not because the sensors fail, but because a comparison with nothing to compare against does not produce a number.

Which is the strange part. Your proprioception is not an instrument you carry around inside you, reporting your own configuration the way a tape measure reports a length. It is a reading taken against a background. And because that background has been constant through every second of your life and every second of the lives of everyone you learned to move from, it has never once had to be noticed. It doesn’t feel like a term in the equation. It feels like the floor of reality.

So the sense of where you are — the thing your practice is actually built on, under the balance and the timing and the knowledge of where your feet are mid-air — has been getting help from something you have never credited, because you have never seen it withdrawn. You have been giving the instrument marks for work the background was doing.

When the background goes, the sense does not degrade gracefully. It collapses, and vision inherits the whole job at once — “you become only eyes” — while itself narrowing to a tunnel. Dipert’s description of what follows is not learning to move in weightlessness. It is more elementary than that: you have to “re-inhabit your body,” realize that you have a head, find out where your arms are. A movement artist of twenty years, working out where his arms are.

What he built to replace it is the part I keep returning to. It comes from contact improvisation, an exercise called navel radiation — lying on your back and sensing outward from around the belly button, through the structure, to the ends of the arms, the legs, the head.

“I’ve been trying to get better at tuning in to where my actual center of mass is, and then using my body as the extension and as the measurement of space from that location.”

That is a reference frame built from the inside. Denied an external constant to measure against, he supplies one — his own center of mass — and measures outward from it. Which suggests the background was never strictly required. What was required was a background. Ours simply came free, so nobody had to choose it, and nobody had to know they were using it.

Dipert ends up somewhere more unsettling than a fact about space. Having spent years with one environmental constant removed, he starts wondering which of the rest are load-bearing — trying, as he puts it, to identify “the difference between what information is integrating into our systems as humans on the earth, which come directly from the environment, and which ones are actually fundamental.” Then the admission: “I hadn’t been asking these questions prior to starting this investigation.”

Of course he hadn’t. Nobody asks what a constant is contributing while it is still constant.

You are not going to get to run this experiment. But the question survives the trip down. Whatever your practice has taught you to feel — where you are, how much you have left, whether that gap is jumpable — none of those are readings of you alone. They are readings of you against something, and the something is not visible from inside the measurement.


This field note references the Movers Mindset episode “Adam Dipert: Space Juggling, Physics, and Changing Your Perspective,” published September 16, 2022.

This work was produced using AI language models directed through an editorial system designed by Craig Constantine. The author selected all source material, designed the creative framework, directed the editorial process, and made all acceptance and revision decisions. The prose was generated by AI under sustained human editorial direction.

Twice a week, free: From the archives on Thursdays, a Field Note on Saturdays. Get them in your inbox →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *